The standard, written down. Without the inflation.

Most NCOs learn the NCOER from hearsay: what a board supposedly wants, what a senior rater supposedly hates, what "Far Exceeded" supposedly means. The actual standard is written in DA PAM 623-3, and it is shorter, stricter, and more useful than the folklore. This guide puts it in your hands.

• The four tiers, verbatim. Did Not Meet, Met, Exceeded, Far Exceeded, quoted straight from DA PAM 623-3, not paraphrased from memory.
• The two-of-four markers. The specific criteria that separate an honest Met from a defensible Exceeded, and Exceeded from Far Exceeded.
• The forbidden "potential" language. The one-sentence rule raters violate most, and how to spot it in your own bullets before someone else does.
• Tier bleed, named and fixed. The inflation failure mode where Met facts get dressed in Far Exceeded adjectives, and why it costs your strongest Soldiers.
• The seven-section bullet formula. Action, impact, magnitude, mapped to the seven section blocks, with past-tense bullets that would survive a review.
• Common rejection patterns. The bullets that get kicked back, and the exact reason each one fails the standard.

Where do we send it? Send me the guide

You'll get the PDF by email, plus occasional notes on writing honest evals faster. Reply "unsubscribe" any time and you're out, no hard feelings.

Free PDF. Every claim cited by paragraph. No adjectives you can't defend.

Who it's for

Raters. If you rate a SGT or above, this is the standard your words are held to. It covers what each tier actually requires, what the duty description baseline does to every bullet under it, and how special-duty assignments change the voice without changing the rules.

You rate Soldiers, not MOSs. The guide doesn't hand you someone else's bullets to copy. It teaches you the standard so that your Soldier's real year, written honestly, holds up in front of anyone who reads it.