The support form is due and the narrative block is empty
You have an officer who did real work, a rating period that went by fast, and a blank block waiting for prose. Turning "she owned the training calendar and gunnery went clean" into a comment that reads like an OER, at the assessment your facts actually carry, is the part that eats the evening.
This writes that first draft in seconds. You give it the facts. It gives you a narrative comment in OER register. Then you edit it, because you know your officer better than any tool does.
How it works
- Describe what your officer did, in plain language. One line is enough.
- Pick the section and the assessment you are writing toward.
- Get a narrative comment you can shape into the support form, then refine.
Narrative, not bullets
OER comments are not NCOER bullets with the "o " knocked off the front. The DA Form 67-10 series wants prose: full sentences, proper capitalization, unit terms spelled out on first reference, and a tone closer to a recommendation than a list. That is what this generator produces for OER, and it is a different output from what the same tool produces for an NCOER.
If you write both, use the right one. The NCOER bullet generator handles the "o " bullet format with its two-line ceiling. This page handles the paragraph.
It holds the assessment to your facts
Here is the real difference between this and a general chatbot. Ask a chatbot for your strongest possible assessment and it will write one, no matter how thin the input is. Everyone reading evals can feel that inflation, and your genuinely strong officers get buried under it.
This checks what you typed against what the assessment actually needs. If your facts describe an officer doing the job well, it writes that honestly and tells you what more would be needed to justify going higher: the measurable outcome, the scope, or the effect that outlasted the rating period.
That restraint is what keeps a rating chain credible, and it is what lets your true standouts stand out.
Lane discipline, which is where OERs get sent back
AR 623-3 paragraph 1-40c draws the line: the rater assesses performance, the senior rater assesses potential. Promotion language, school recommendations, and "ready for the next level" belong to the senior rater. Put them in the rater's narrative and you have handed your S1 a reason to bounce the form.
The comments this writes stay in the performance lane. If you want the reasoning behind that rule, the Academy walks through it in the no-potential rule and the rating chain.
Built on the regulation, not made up
Every comment is written against AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3, the same publications your rating chain enforces. Correct register, appropriate language, and content built to survive review instead of coming back for a rewrite. If you want the source text rather than a summary, start with the four tiers, quoted verbatim and common rejection patterns.
Free to try, and honest about what is paid
You can generate comments here free, with no account, right now. When you are ready to build a full evaluation, save your work, and export a clean support form, that is where a free account comes in. The writing help is free. Finishing the real document that is due is the part worth paying for.
The other free tools
- Free NCOER bullet generator, for the "o " bullet format.
- Army award generator, for AAM, ARCOM, and MSM recommendations.
Questions
Is the OER bullet generator really free?
Yes. You can generate OER narrative comments on this page with no account, three per month. Building and exporting a full evaluation uses a free account, and completing a real due eval is the paid step.
What does it actually write?
Rater narrative comments for the DA Form 67-10 series performance section: full sentences, proper capitalization, and the formal register a rating chain expects. It does not fill in the form for you and it does not check any boxes.
Does it keep the rater and senior rater lanes separate?
Yes. AR 623-3 paragraph 1-40c puts performance in the rater lane and potential in the senior rater lane. The comments it writes stay on what the officer did and leave promotion and future assignment language out.
Will it write a stronger assessment than my facts support?
No, and that is deliberate. If what you typed does not carry the assessment you picked, it tells you what evidence is missing instead of inflating the narrative.
Is this an official Army product?
No. BulletForge is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense. It is a private writing tool.
Generate your first comment above, free. When you are ready to finish the whole eval, create a free account.